Would your tests actually catch a bad AI-agent commit?

You're shipping a lot of code from Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot without reading every line. That only works if your tests actually catch a bad change, not just pass because the agent wrote both the code and the tests. I'll check your repo and CI for that gap and tell you exactly what's missing.

⚠️ This isn't hypothetical: one team's agent-written service had 140 tests and 92% coverage, all green — the bug was a reference-equality check instead of a business-key check, and it silently duplicated production records two days after deploy. High coverage didn't catch it. Mutation testing would have.
This is for you if:
Not for you if:

Pick a tier

$99
Gap checklist
  • Coverage %, mutation score (if any), presence of acceptance/gherkin specs, presence of a verifier/spec-validation gate in CI
  • Plain pass/fail list against each check
  • Turnaround: 48h
Pay $99
One-time. No subscription.
How it works
  1. Pay above, then send read-only access to your repo and CI config (GitHub read-only invite or a zip export) to iploskovitov@gmail.com
  2. I go through it by hand — not just a script output
  3. You get the checklist (or full report) back within 48 hours; access is dropped once it's done, nothing is kept or reused
This is a diagnostic on your existing test/CI setup, not a guarantee that nothing will ever slip through, and not a replacement for actually reading code you don't trust. It's meant to tell you where your safety net has holes before an agent finds them for you.